Hello There, Guest!  


Generally, when I publish something here, I always have in mind to invite others who know something about the subject of interest. If they come here, good. If they don't answer, there is nothing I can do. I have contacted several authors, e.g., Rindermann, Thompson, Beaver, Kaplan, etc. for papers not published by me. Only Rindermann and Kaplan replied. The first said he will look at it (but I don't know what he was referring to because in the same mail I sent him my data on racial gaps in NAEP...) and Kaplan, as you know, refused to reply because OP attracts somewhat hereditarians.

In the article I have published on the black-white changes in GSS wordsum over time, I have emailed lot of people. No one has commented on it (although I got some replies, these are not "comments"). I will continue, however. Because there is nothing to lose. And it's better to communicate his ideas this way. When there is an occasion, I always invite people to review.

Perhaps this journal does not have enough "prestige" to persuade scholars to be reviewers. I think it's the most likely reason.


EDIT: October 12, 2014

For those who wants to know what happened to my former pseudonym, I have asked Emil to change it. The email reads :

Quote:Is it possible to change my pseudonym "menghu1001" into "Meng Hu" ?

I have the feeling that most scholars will not appreciate being reviewed by pseudonyms, and menghu1001 sound like a pseudonym. Although people her do what they want, it's clear that fewer pseudonyms would have more credibility. For the journal especially.
Messages In This Thread
Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Mar-24, 10:51:41
RE: List of reviewers - by Philbrick Bastinado - 2014-Mar-25, 04:03:59
RE: List of reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Mar-25, 16:03:07
RE: Reviewers - by Philbrick Bastinado - 2014-Mar-29, 00:33:16
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Mar-29, 15:26:29
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Mar-30, 19:46:44
RE: Reviewers - by Dalliard - 2014-Jul-14, 20:59:47
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Jul-15, 01:29:23
RE: Reviewers - by Meng Hu - 2014-Jul-16, 00:06:32
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Oct-09, 05:48:32
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Jul-16, 08:43:30
RE: Reviewers - by Meng Hu - 2014-Jul-16, 13:01:27
RE: Reviewers - by Duxide - 2014-Sep-08, 18:06:41
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2014-Sep-08, 21:20:30
RE: Reviewers - by Meng Hu - 2014-Oct-09, 17:13:55
RE: Reviewers - by Meng Hu - 2015-Jan-30, 19:54:43
RE: Reviewers - by Duxide - 2015-Jan-30, 21:05:39
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Jan-30, 20:28:14
RE: Reviewers - by Duxide - 2015-Feb-02, 18:20:20
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Feb-02, 18:39:29
RE: Reviewers - by Duxide - 2015-Feb-02, 20:53:33
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Feb-05, 16:47:57
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Mar-01, 13:02:24
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Mar-16, 18:21:56
RE: Reviewers - by Meng Hu - 2015-Mar-16, 19:33:42
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Mar-16, 20:15:51
RE: Reviewers - by Meng Hu - 2015-Mar-20, 00:56:56
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Oct-28, 23:50:19
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Nov-27, 21:34:34
RE: Reviewers - by Emil - 2015-Nov-27, 21:54:07
RE: Reviewers - by Peter Frost - 2016-Jun-07, 13:33:33
RE: Reviewers - by Gmeisenberg - 2016-Jun-07, 16:05:32
Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)